Tuesday, May 23, 2017

Hickson and Parker | Abduction Files







                Interest in UFOs began to spread
like wildfire after the 1940s Roswell incident in New Mexico but some of the
most known abduction cases didn’t start until the 1960s, with the first being
the Barney and Betty Hill case in 1961 and 12 years after that in 1973, another
famous case would rise from Mississippi that would send one man into a mental
break down and another to write and speak about their experience.




                Event:
                The
night of October 11, 1973 was supposed to be any normal night for Hickson and
Parker, both Shipyard workers and friends, who made it a regular to fish off an
old pier on the Pascagoula River. That all changed when they both heard an odd
“zipping” or “Buzzing” sound that sounded much like the starting of an electric
motor, and as they heard this strange sound they saw two blue lights coming
towards them opposite of the river. The lights glowed brightly from a cigar
shaped craft that had a dome on the top of it – but to their horror, it kept
coming towards them.
                As
it got closer, they were able to tell that the craft was thirty-five feet long;
it stopped; hovering in place two feet above the water without so much as
causing the water to stir below. The men stared in shock and disbelief; a door
opened and three creatures emerged. These weren’t your typical grey skinned
aliens that at the time you heard about on the telly, but instead reptilian
with no clothes what so ever. They stood on legs that looked fused together
which when they walked gave them stiff movements like that of a robot. They
were about four and half feet to five feet tall, with rough scaly skin, no
eyes, mouth or neck that were discernible from the current distance. Where the
creatures hands should have been were instead crab or lobster like claws.
                 Suddenly a beam of light stems from the crafts
and renders the two men paralyzed, forcing them to stay in place as the odd
creatures approached them with unsettling movements. Somehow, the creatures
levitated the men off the ground, grabbed them and floated their bodies through
the air and into the ship. By then, Parker, the 19 year old, was so frightened
at this experience that he passed out completely and the description of the
event was left to Hickson, 42, who had been drinking whiskey that night.
                On
board the ship, the 42 year old man was able to get a better look at these
creatures. They indeed had no normal eyes or mouth but instead were tiny slits.
During the entire time, these creatures did not speak to him but instead to
each other using odd “buzzing” sounds, as they examined the men with a huge
lens or what Hickson described as an elliptical-shaped eye. The examine of both
men apparently lasted less than half an hour and after, they were guided back
to the dock where they were fishing from.
                After
their return, Parker had regained consciousness and Hickson believed that he
had lost no track of time. Both men were fully aware of what had happened and
even accepted the fact that it was real and not a joint hallucination, or at
least, they claimed. Terrified of what had happened, they went back to their
car and sat there for an hour trying to accept the encounter.
                Hickson
needed three shots of liquor from a bottle in his car to calm his nerves before
they both decided to report what had happened.

                Back
to Reality:
                Instead
of going straight to the police, they went to Keesler Air force base, already
having heard about Project Blue Book, but when they finally got an answer, the
official over the phone told them that they no longer handled UFO reports and
that they should go to their local police.
                So
10:30 P.M, the two men walked into the Jackson County Sheriff station and told
the desk sergeant and Sheriff Fred Diamond about their encounter. Sheriff Fred
Diamond could see that both Hickson and Parker were clearly traumatized by
something but with their lack of proof and no evidence for their story, the
Sheriff could only think of catching them in a lie.
                In order to coax one of the two
men to admitting the possible hoax, they set the two men up in a room under the
belief they were alone. Eavesdropping on their conversation with a concealed
microphone, the Sheriff listened to their private conversation. Within just a
few minutes they began talking about the incident as if it were a real event,
and during their entire conversation they were in a state of shock. The topic
went on about how Parker wanted to see a doctor and Hickson kept talking about
Parker’s unconsciousness when the creatures’ carried them both into the ship.
Parker mentioned that he had never passed out before in his entire life and
that the experience along was too terrifying.
                The
most notable thing mentioned during the conversation was Hickson saying,
“People better wake up because if this happened to us, it must have happened to
others.”
                Despite
the taped conversation, the sheriff was still skeptical about the mens’ story.
Hickson and Parker even told the Sheriff that they’d take a lie detector tests
just to show they were telling the truth but that never happened under the
Sheriff’s view.
                At
work, Hickson and Parker told parts of their story to their coworkers and in
doing so, the story spread – eventually they got a call from the Sheriff where
he told them that his office was flooded with reporters that wanted to know
more about their otherworldly encounter; but this isn’t what they wanted. Both
men firmly believed that the public would think they were a couple of crazy
people or worse, attention seekers who just made up a fantastic story to get
public notice.
                Overhearing
their story, Hickson’s foreman told the shipyard boss, who then told Hickson
and Parker to get an attorney to represent them. Doing this, the attorney set
up a meeting with the officers from Keesler Air Force Base – who then
interviewed them along with Air Force Intelligence Officers. In the end,
Hickson did take a lie detector test that was set up by his attorney, and did
pass; however, the test was conducted by an inexperienced polygraph operator.
                Eventually
both Hickson and Parker moved from Pascagoula due to the overwhelming publicity
surrounding the event. Parker eventually suffered a nervous breakdown which
Hickson said was due to Parker’s difficulty in accepting the terrifying event.
Hickson went on to talk about their story at UFO conventions and even writing a
book on it.

                Debunking
or Theories
               
                As
far as the public was concerned, the event that Hickson and Parker went through
was entirely true. Against what Hickson and Parker was told, the Air Force
still investigates serious UFO sightings till this day and that it was just
that they had no interest in Hickson and Parker’s case. Hickson did admit that
he was drinking before and after this event, which casts doubt on the truth or
realism of his story.
                Writer
Joe Eszterhas, wrote an article in Rolling Stone Magazine on the matter that
said during his investigation of the event, he found that the toll booth
operator who had a full view of the area where the men were at, and saw nothing
unusual during the time period that the men claimed they had been abducted.
Even the security cameras at the nearby shipyard picked up nothing.
                A
few days after the event, a truck drivers traveling east of the Pascagoula
River claimed that his vehicle was beamed up into a strange craft and that he
was examined by small creatures.
                In
2001, a Naval Chief Petty Officer Mike Cataldo, stated that he and his
crewmates were driving along Route 90 from Pascagoula on the night of the
Hickson/Parker incident and saw a saucer-like craft traveling over the highway.
It had flashing lights and a flat shape like “tambourine”. At first Cataldo
thought it was just a group of flashing lights before he was able to see a
definite shape. The saucer seemed to be hovering over a clump of trees after it
crossed the road and then took off. Cataldo wasn’t the only one who saw this
object: cars on the road slowed down to look at it. Back at base the next day,
Cataldo told his superior officers about what he saw, but none of them did anything
about it. So he called a public information officer at Keesler Air Force base,
but he didn’t think the officer did anything with his report. He found out
about Hickson and Parker’s sighting after he was on temporary duty in
California. In the end, Cataldo’s report did end up in the Pascagoula case
file.
                Famed
UFO skeptic, Philip J. Klass noted holes in Hickson’s account, for example,
Hickson referenced that the creatures had a hole for a mouth but later called
it a slit. Mr. Klass also was the one that pointed out the lie detector test
was done by an inexperienced operator and that even after this was pointed out
to Hickson, Hickson refused to take another test that would be administered by
an expert police examiner. Klass conluded this case as a hoax, including even a
fact that Hickson had once been fired for improperly obtaining money from
employees under his supervision.
                As
for my theory and opinion – I am not entirely sure where to put my foot down
on. The more I look over the minor details of the case that I can find, the
more I believe that it is a hoax as well. If Hickson was fired for such discrimncies
 maybe he convinced Parker into telling
this story in order to get a little fame and fortune for his story but what
about Parker’s mental break down?
                Parker
admitted that he wasn’t sure what those creatures were, whether they were
aliens or demons – and maybe he did see something. Maybe he was drinking as
well, or during that time period, doing some other drug and hallucinated.
                I
personally don’t know – the story has a few holes and definitely isn’t like
some of the more believable cases like Betty and Barney Hills.
            After
                Parker
was so uncomfortable with the unwelcomed attention, especially with the newsmen
and UFO enthusiasts, that he tried to dodge the spotlight for decades. He even
made claim that he would just be at a gas station filling his car and someone
would recognize him. He moved frequently, had a mental break down, was
hospitalized but eventually released and also returned to Mississippi’s Gulf
Coast.
                Hickson
on the other hand appeared on talk shows, gave lectures and interviews and even
self-published a book in 1983 titled, “UFO Contact at Pascagoula.” He reported
to have three more encounters with these creatures in 1974 and said that these
aliens told him that they were peaceful 
another bit of a contradictory since they apparently spoke in buzzing
tones. Hickson passed away in 2011 still keeping strong on his story.
                Now
tell me, do you believe in this abduction or do you think it was a hoax?
                Due
to Youtubes advertiser family friendly grounds, videos like mine are being
targeted. To support my videos and me, please check out my patreon page listed
below. And for more creepy and bizarre, please like, comment and subscribe.

Tuesday, May 9, 2017

Jack the Ripper| Serious Killers







Before:
            In
the 1800s, the district of Whitechapel was a crime ridden quarter where 76,000
people lived in poverty, majority of them immigrants. The district was known
for being the worst slums with the worse overcrowding and highest death rates
in England, and it didn’t help that the jobs offered little payment. Women
during this time period could hardly get jobs and the jobs they could get
hardly paid them enough for a bed at night, and so, many of them turned to
prostitution. While men relied on assault and robbery to survive. With crime
and prostitution, violent attacks against women were common place in the East
End.
                So
why was the murders caused by Jack the Ripper so famous?
                The
way he went with his crimes, how he’d done it and even more, how he got away
with it.
              
  Iconic
five:
                With
only five murders truly credited to him, he is still the most infamous serial
killer in the world. Named Leather Apron or Whitechapel murderer, he ultimately
is known as Jack the Ripper.  The reason
for his fame doesn’t revolve solely around his mysterious identity but how he committed
his crimes. He surgically mutilated and disemboweled his victims with a
precision most would only assume a doctor could perform; meaning he had a
relationship with a scalpel for some time period. Like many criminals in
Eastend, his victims were prostitutes, all of which had their throats slit,
were disemboweled and their entrails removed.

-        
August 31 1888
Mary Anne “Polly” Nichols,
42.
                His
first victim was Mary Anne. Mary Anne was an alcoholic whose nickname on the
street was Pretty Polly. Her murder was so newly gruesome that a police surgeon
stated, “Only a mad man could have done this.” Her body was discovered by 2
workmen not far from the London Hospital. Her throat had been cut, she was stabbed
multiple times in the stomach and her abdomen had been cut open.
                Residents
were so upset by the murder that they had the street renamed Durward street –
which it is also no longer named now.

-        
September 8, 1888
“Dark” Annie Chapman, 47.
Found on 29 Hanbury Street, her body was found alongside
a few of her possessions, her entrails still steaming from the fresh kill. Her
throat was slit, she was disemboweled, her intestines thrown over her shoulder
with her uterus removed and missing. They never did find the missing organ.

-        
September 30, 1888
Elizabeth ‘Long Liz’ Stride,
44
                Found
in Dutfield’s Yard, her body was left less touched than the first two. Her
throat was cut and there was a small injury to her ear but her body remained
intact leading the police to believe that Jack had been disturbed.

-        
September 30, 1888
Catherine Eddowes, 46
                Recently
released from jail for public drunkenness, she was attacked in Mitre Square. Like
the others her throat was cut, abdomen sliced open, intestines over her
shoulder and her uterus and left kidney were removed. But something new was
done as well, her face had been mutilated, her ears were cut off and triangular
cuts, much like a circus clown, were in her eyes. Nearby on the wall, a message
was left, “The jewes (sic) are not men to be blamed for nothing.”
                This
started a theory that Jack was a Jewish ritual slaughter man

-        
November 9, 1888
Mary Kelly, 25
                The
most gruesome murder out of the five, Mary’s body was found in her apartment
naked on her bed, throat cut, face mutilated, abdomen cavity was completely
emptied, her breasts cut off and placed under her head and right foot and her
liver was found between her feet. Out of all her organs, her heart was missing.
                This
was an act that showed he had time to commit it. Behind locked doors with the
security of walls, he paid no mind as he slaughtered her.

Letters from the Killer
                After
Jack the Rippers second murder many letters were sent to the police and the
newspapers, all claiming to be from the killer himself. Though most were
regarded as pranks and others even false creations by the press themselves to
help publize the killer for their own personal gain. Only three ultimately made
it into history as possible letters from the famed killer, even though they are
still under speculation.
                1:
Dear Boss
                “Dear Boss,



I keep
hearing the police have caught me but they won’t fix me just yet. I have
laughed when they look so clever and talk about being on the right
track. That joke about Leather Apron gave me real fits. I am down on whores and
shant quit ripping them till I do get buckled. Grand work the last job was. I
gave the lady no time to squeal. How can they catch me now. I love my work and
want to start again. You will soon hear of me with my funny little games. I
saved some of the proper red stuff in a ginger beer bottle over the last
job to write with but it went thick like glue and I cant use it. Red ink is fit
enough I hope. Ha. Ha. The next job I do I shall clip the ladys ears off and
send to the police officers just for jolly wouldn’t you. Keep this letter back
till I do a bit more work, then give it out straight. My knife’s so nice and
sharp I want to get to work right away if I get a chance. Good Luck. Yours
truly




Jack the
Ripper.




Don’t mind
me giving the trade name




PS wasn’t
good enough to post this before I got all the red ink off my hands curse it. No
luck yet. They say I’m a doctor now. Ha ha.”





                The
letter was written with red ink with bad punctuations and spelling. It was
September 27, 1888, when the letter arrived at the Central News Agency in
London. It was initially thought as a hoax until Catherine Eddowes body was
found with her ear partially clipped off.
                Regardless
of the promising clipped ear in the letter and the actual clipped ear of Jack’s
victim after the letter was sent, the letter is still believed to be a hoax and
many think it was all just a coincidence. The reason for this thought was that
Catherine’s ear had seemed too been nipped during the attack and looked more
like an accident than intentional. But what made this letter famous was how it
was signed. Below all the terrible punctuation, the letter was written from a
“Jack the Ripper” and thus, the name spread and now the killer is famously
known as Jack.
                To
further the belief the letter was just a hoax, later on after the letter had
gained a little fame and spread throughout England, a journalist confessed to
have written the letter along with a few other messages in order to “Keep the
business alive.”

                2:
“Saucy Jacky” Post Card
                “I
was not codding dear old Boss when I gave you the tip, you’ll hear about Saucy
Jacky’s work tomorrow double event this time number one squealed a bit couldn’t
finish straight off. Had not got time to get ears off for police thanks for
keeping last letter back till I got to work again.
                Jack
the Rippper”

                Received
on October 1, 1888. The postcard is a little hard to understand with the poorly
written text and the street talk but it mentions two of Jack’s victims that
were killed very close to one another. Elizabeth and Catherine were both killed
on September 30th, and part of Catherine’s ear was clipped.
                The
letter was postmarked more than 24 hours after the killings took place, and
long enough after for the details on the killings to already have spread to the
public. This postcard is also believed to have been written by the same
journalist as the “Dear Boss” letter. Further proving it to be more of a hoax
than a letter from the real Jack.
                However
here is an interesting fact though, the “Dear Boss” letter and the “Saucy
Jacky” postcard went missing. The Dear Boss letter was recovered in 1987, but
the Postcard is still missing.

                3:
From Hell
                From
Hell.
                Mr.
Lusk,
                Sor
                I
send you half the Kidne I took from one woman and prasarved it for you tother
piece I fried and ate it was very nise. I may send you the bloody knif that
took it out if you only wate a whil longer
                Signed
                Catch
me when you can Mishter Lusk

Received on October 15, 1888
along with the letter was a box with half a kidney. The officers in charge of
the case went to a kidney specialist to see if the kidney was truly one of the
victim’s. Though not 100% sure, the kidney specialist believed it was NOT one
of the victims’ kidneys. Like the other letters before this one, the letter and
the kidney has gone missing and the images we see of the letter today is just a
photograph taken of the letter before the loss.

Where’s Jackie:
                There
is a list of hundreds of suspects of whom could be Jack the Ripper, some going
as high up as Prince Albert Victor, who had sustainable alibis on the nights of
the victims’ murders – he wasn’t in London at the time – and some as far as
H.H. Holmes himself, the infamous Chicago murderer. Some claiming that the year
1888, no one knew where Holmes was, and so he could have possibly been Jack the
Ripper  - though his way of killing is
significantly different with  a wide
range of type of victim.  There are a few
on the list of suspects that stick out better than any others and I could go on
for hours talking about each person and why – but I will try to make it short
and simple for the sake of this video.

                1:
James Maybrick
                James
Maybrick was a local Liverpool merchant who made a good name for himself as he
worked in England and even traveled to America. He died in 1889 by the hands of
his wife who murdered him with arsenic poisoning. But his name didn’t die with him;
more than a century later he was accused of being Jack the Ripper.
                In
1992 a diary suspected to have belonged to Maybrick surface – though there was
no name in the diary claiming to be his – the diary was first introduce to have
belonged to Michael Barrett, who was an unemployed Liverpool scrap metal
dealer. However his wife claimed it was in her family for as long as she could
remember and only gave it to Michael for aspiration to write since he wanted to
be a writer.
                In
1993 it was published as “The Diary of Jack the Ripper” under great
controversy. The debate whether the diary was a hoax or not brought on many
tests; one claiming that the notes were confusing and complicated. Tests on the
ink showed that the ink used was inconsistent to the time period it was claimed
to have been written in.
                Document
expert, Kenneth W. Rendell, analyzed the writing and said that the handwriting
style seemed more 20th century than Victorian and even noted factual
contradictions and handwriting inconsistencies.

                2:
Francis Tumblety
                Francis
Tumblety was an Irish-born American who traveled back and forth from America to
Europe doing his trades which was an “Indian Herb” Doctor. At the time of the
murders Tumblety was doing his practice in London and apparently was staying in
a housing unit in Whitechapel during the murders. He was arrested in 1888 for
unrelated gross acts but he was let go. Almost immediately after the police
wanted to arrest him once again for the connection to the murders but he had
fled to France. 
                He
had trouble with the laws in both America and England due to his trade and also
his homosexual tendencies (which in England at the time was illegal) but he
didn’t fit the witness descriptions of the Ripper. It didn’t help that when he
fled the murders also stopped. He was seen as a good suspect due to his career
in medicine that may have required some learning in anatomy and even some
believe that the handwriting analysis that was done matched Tumblety to Jack
the Ripper’s.
                Which
is odd since almost all if not all, of the letters claiming to be Jack the
Ripper suspect to be hoaxes. Ripperologists say that he doesn’t fit the
description in both looks and age. A professional criminal profiler and forensic
handwriting analyst claims that Tumblety  is in fact the most likely Ripper suspect,
which he made claim of in the “Jack the Ripper” 
episode of the History Channel’s “Mysteryquest.”

3: Aaron Kosminski
Probably the most known to be
the suspect was Aaron Kosminski. Aaron was a Jewish Polish emigrant who lived
in England for majority of his life. He worked as a hairdresser in the East End
of London in the Whitechapel district and was there during the time of the
murders. In 1891 he was institutionalized into an insane asylum due to being a
paranoid schizophrenic.
                He was on the list of suspects from the start but
there was little evidence connecting him and some even believe that the
Kosminski could have been another person who was also a polish Jew of the same
age and even name who was a violent patient at the same asylum he was at. The
only evidence claiming to make him a true suspect was founded by author Russell
Edwards in September 2014 when he claimed to have proof of Kosminski’s guilt
with mitochondrial DNA that he got from a shawl he bought from an auction that
claimed to have been left at one of the murder scenes.
                However skeptics say that his claim has never been
published or even verified by a peer-review process and his methods on finding
this evidence has been heavily criticized and for good reason. For instance, Russell
Edwards said that officer Simpson took the shawl from Catherine Eddowes crime
scene and took it home to his wife as a gift and that the DNA has been on the
shawl ever since as it has been passed down generations.
                Critics claim that Officer Simpson wasn’t even at the
crime scene that night when he apparently took this shawl. Even if there was a
shawl, my question is why would you take a blood stained shawl from a dead
person and take it your wife? Especially since the crimes committed by Jack the
Ripper was seen as so disturbing that people would fear such items.
I will like to point out that
Kosminski had apparently been ill in the head since 1885, having heard auditory
hallucinations and paranoid with fear of being fed by other people, he also
refused to wash or bathe. His insanity was recorded as “Self-abuse” which could
have meant overly masturbation. His poor diet also kept him emaciated for
years; his would make him frail, thin and weak.
                Being weak would make it hard to quickly disembowel
victims, even harder to catch them and hold them long enough to slice their
throat without showing extreme struggle if not even getting away. These woman
were prostitutes and knew that physical abuse might come down the line – they
would fight if need be and against a very weak male whose not all in the head
may be an easy contender for them.
                I, too, have paranoid schizophrenia and doing
anything during an episode can be fuzzy and disoriented unless I hit a fit of
rage or something during the likes but never to the point of knowing where to
disembowel or how to slice. Mental disorders don’t cause people to gain
knowledge and I can’t imagine Aaron having the knowledge of where to slice,
dice and take out what was taken out of these victims. But hey, that’s just my
opinion.

My Theory:
I’m no police officer,
investigator or criminal writer like some of these theorists are, I have never
gone to college for any of those subjects either but criminals, disorders and
all other things bizarre is a very big subject that I am extremely passionate
about. So take my lack of school knowledge in mind but my also research and
diligence into the things I love.
From my years of watching and
reading about criminals I have learned that most criminals, especially
murderers and serial killers that for some reason or another they go after
particularly victims. How they kill also depends on what they are into and what
has happened in their past.
                What
I am trying to get at is this: What if Jack the Ripper went after female,
middle aged prostitutes for a reason?
                Most
killers go after victims they see a relation to or a hate for. Males who were
especially attached to their mothers or were abused or neglected by them,
usually go after female victims. Almost as if de-facing the victim and seeing
who they truly want to kill. Same thing with father figures, males may go after
other males or even instead – an entire family – in order to gain some control
over the head of the house or dismantling the family.
                If
Jack went after middle aged females, maybe he had an abusive relationship with
his mother? Maybe she, too was a prostitute? Most prostitutes during those time
periods paid no mind to their children and often cared only for themselves,
drinking, gambling and the such and would yell, scream, and even hurt those closest
to them due to their own addictions.
                Digging
even deeper, Jack the Ripper would almost always take out the uterus, a pure
sign of a woman’s feminity – what makes a woman a woman. Almost – dehumanizing
them. That would take a lot of hate. So much hate that I can only imagine that
the killer must have been also sexual abused as a child.
                So
let’s put it all together if you’re not hearing what I am saying. A boy born
out of wedlock – most likely – to a prostitute mother who may have been
addicted to the drink, was probably abuse sexually and physically grew up with
so much hate and anger that killing animals became a hobby. Learning that he
liked dissection, he studied and went to school for anatomy, probably becoming
a doctor or something of that sort.
Fulfilling the
knowledge of dissection, he finally wanted to test the waters and began killing
prostitute women that reminded him of his mother. With each kill he grew more
personal, probably seeing his mother’s face as he slaughtered each victim – and
each victim was more gruesome than the last until the very last kill – Mary
Kelly.
                Mary
Kelly was so disfigured it was almost impossible for police to identify her if
it wasn’t for her body being found in her bedroom.
                Now
I don’t know of a suspect who had this sort of past – nor do I have a suspect
in mind. I don’t know why the killer stopped. Maybe he moved on?
                But
this was just my theory, believe it or not?
                Who
do you think was the killer?